Welcome to the Australian Ford Forums forum.

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and inserts advertising. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features without post based advertising banners. Registration is simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Please Note: All new registrations go through a manual approval queue to keep spammers out. This is checked twice each day so there will be a delay before your registration is activated.

Go Back   Australian Ford Forums > Club and Speciality Forums > Forum Community Car Clubs > AU Falcon.com.au

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 28-04-2006, 09:42 PM   #1
scottyp
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 125
Default intake g&d

what is this g&d cai i hear so much about

scottyp is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 28-04-2006, 10:02 PM   #2
FRDGAL
GT-P #0336
 
FRDGAL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 2,360
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by scottyp
what is this g&d cai i hear so much about
Here you go:

http://www.fordforums.com.au/showthread.php?t=2821
__________________
2003 FULLY OPTIONED MERCURY SILVER BA GT-P BUILD #336
REVERSE CAMERA - SAT NAV - PIONEER SUB & AMP - SUNROOF - DVD PLAYER - CUSTOM DUAL EXHAUST
~Tuned By Bluepower Racing~
FRDGAL is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 28-04-2006, 10:14 PM   #3
JeffAU1
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
JeffAU1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Glenmore Park, Sydney
Posts: 648
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by FRDGAL_AU6
Thanks for that, but has anybody had this mod done to their car in Sydney ?

If so from who and at what price ? Was it the same setup

Jeff
__________________
:eclipsee_ MY CAR :eclipsee_
JeffAU1 is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 28-04-2006, 11:43 PM   #4
Smoked
Burnin Rubber
 
Smoked's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Melbourne, Victoria
Posts: 1,824
Default

Are these designed to run on AU intechs, or are we talking just Ba's. The website only lays out info for BA owners.
__________________
2001 AUII Forte (LPG)
K&N Air Filter
Tickford Air Intake
***Coming Soon: Clear Side Repeaters***
Quote:
Originally Posted by The-ShowStoPPa
...dont get me wrong this 3.8v6 is pretty special, it does come with the popular shake rattle and roll option and the auto compliments this with the ever popular snap crackle and pop feature
Smoked is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 28-04-2006, 11:58 PM   #5
daveb
G&D Performance Australia
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 5
Default

There are intakes designed for AU and BA. They are easy to install and we are happy to provide instructions or recommend someone to fit it in SYD.


PM me if you want a contact in SYD.

Regards,

DAVE
daveb is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 29-04-2006, 12:03 AM   #6
FRDGAL
GT-P #0336
 
FRDGAL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 2,360
Default

AU & BA

Merkus it's on my AU but I'm not in Sydney unfortunately so I can't help you there. I think G&D can mail order the CAI to you and as far as I know it's a simple fit. (mine was fitted for me)

Edit: Awww dave you beat me to it lol.
__________________
2003 FULLY OPTIONED MERCURY SILVER BA GT-P BUILD #336
REVERSE CAMERA - SAT NAV - PIONEER SUB & AMP - SUNROOF - DVD PLAYER - CUSTOM DUAL EXHAUST
~Tuned By Bluepower Racing~
FRDGAL is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 30-04-2006, 12:43 PM   #7
SIKSIX
Its gone V
 
SIKSIX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 359
Default

Im interested in the intake but what sort of power loss should i be looking at in my forte with the full head light compared to the xr lights, which let air through the light?
SIKSIX is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 30-04-2006, 01:23 PM   #8
svo347
AFF's 1st DM.......
 
svo347's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Wha???... There is only 2 states 2 be in.. WA or Drunk..
Posts: 6,200
Default

Secondly... would it fit an ED XR8?
__________________
FORD GIVING POWER TO THE PEOPLE
Alloy headed 347ci EDXR8
13.21 @107.7mph
Quote:
Originally Posted by zetec
I know what lengths they go to to ensure it's more than just a Ford sticker on the part. Ford doesn't throw it's name on anything for a quick buck.
06 Turbo Terri AWD 6 sp in Neo with stuff i didnt even need, side steps,15.2 inch roof mounted DVD,Pioneer $tezza,Selby 30/18mm swaybars,debunged,100 cpsi Ballistic cat,Plazmaman under battery Cai injectors 14/lb boost,ZF tuned,Xtreme's magic. :
svo347 is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 30-04-2006, 02:50 PM   #9
Casper
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
Contributing Member
 
Casper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 12,083
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SIKSIX
Im interested in the intake but what sort of power loss should i be looking at in my forte with the full head light compared to the xr lights, which let air through the light?
none, they work the same on XR's and non XR's alike. The headlight unit is not blocking any air. The BA's headlight design is not so different to the AU's design and thats where they get their intake from, behind the headlight.
Looks 100% stock and works a treat too.. love mine:


Quote:
Originally Posted by svo347
Secondly... would it fit an ED XR8?
Sorry, only AU and BA designs at the moment, not avaliable for E series... yet.
__________________
Older, wiser, poorer.


Now in Euro-Trash. VW Coupe V6 4motion.
Casper is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 30-04-2006, 03:24 PM   #10
XR6-VCT-2000
Fantastic Plastic
 
XR6-VCT-2000's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Mars most of the time
Posts: 2,019
Default

looks like the pipe exiting the airbox is around 3" or larger (before the taper down to the original join) ? , has that got a pod in the airbox ?
__________________
------------------------------------------------------------

:eclipsee_
XR6-VCT-2000 is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 30-04-2006, 03:32 PM   #11
Casper
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
Contributing Member
 
Casper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 12,083
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by XR6-VCT-2000
looks like the pipe exiting the airbox is around 3" or larger (before the taper down to the original join) ? , has that got a pod in the airbox ?
The original piping is used.. the tapered section actually outperformed a 3" untapered pipe on the dyno consistantly.

Yes, theres a large pod hidded in there.
__________________
Older, wiser, poorer.


Now in Euro-Trash. VW Coupe V6 4motion.
Casper is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 30-04-2006, 04:48 PM   #12
XR6-VCT-2000
Fantastic Plastic
 
XR6-VCT-2000's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Mars most of the time
Posts: 2,019
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Casper
The original piping is used.. the tapered section actually outperformed a 3" untapered pipe on the dyno consistantly.

Yes, theres a large pod hidded in there.

ahh , that explains the original smaller taper size pipe going back to the 3" size on the airbox (to suit the pod).. cheers ;). I remember in your other thread reading about that original tapered pipe worked better than the full 3" untapered pipe , it didn't suprise me either - i can see the benifits of having a full 3" pipe from t/b to airbox if the pipe wasn't very long or if the pod was bolted straight onto the t/b, but in the case of the setup in our cars (with the I6) - the main pipe is way to long to be running just straight 3" pipe all the way imo unless you had maybe a v8 worked hard requiring mass amounts of cfm airflow which the taper would maybe restrict. But in the case of our I6's , it has been proven in the past in lots of cases to do with airflow ( not just in cars ) that tapering a long pipe can increase the airflow , as the smaller end of the pipe creates like a pressure that helps move the air toward the larger end of the pipe more freely (to the t/b in our case) - and not restricting the flow at the larger end of the pipe (@ the t/b) providing the smaller end of the pipe can supply the max air/cfm needed by the source. This sorta theory was used in those cyclone vacumes too .. just my 2 cents on the topic anyways.. there is probably a hell of a lot more to it im sure , and i'de like to know , but this is just a bit of an understanding of what i have on it ;) . cheers , looks good too Casper, nice and tidy and looks original , well done G&D too ;)
__________________
------------------------------------------------------------

:eclipsee_
XR6-VCT-2000 is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 30-04-2006, 10:11 PM   #13
RspecAU
BA GT-P Owner
 
RspecAU's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: In the GT-P
Posts: 1,599
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by XR6-VCT-2000
ahh , that explains the original smaller taper size pipe going back to the 3" size on the airbox (to suit the pod).. cheers ;). I remember in your other thread reading about that original tapered pipe worked better than the full 3" untapered pipe , it didn't suprise me either - i can see the benifits of having a full 3" pipe from t/b to airbox if the pipe wasn't very long or if the pod was bolted straight onto the t/b, but in the case of the setup in our cars (with the I6) - the main pipe is way to long to be running just straight 3" pipe all the way imo unless you had maybe a v8 worked hard requiring mass amounts of cfm airflow which the taper would maybe restrict. But in the case of our I6's , it has been proven in the past in lots of cases to do with airflow ( not just in cars ) that tapering a long pipe can increase the airflow , as the smaller end of the pipe creates like a pressure that helps move the air toward the larger end of the pipe more freely (to the t/b in our case) - and not restricting the flow at the larger end of the pipe (@ the t/b) providing the smaller end of the pipe can supply the max air/cfm needed by the source. This sorta theory was used in those cyclone vacumes too .. just my 2 cents on the topic anyways.. there is probably a hell of a lot more to it im sure , and i'de like to know , but this is just a bit of an understanding of what i have on it ;) . cheers , looks good too Casper, nice and tidy and looks original , well done G&D too ;)
If you want to know more ring Glenn or Matt at G&D they would be happy to help you with any questions.
__________________
DAILY DRIVER/TRACK CAR
BUILD NUMBER 006
299.5 rwkw's 12.74 @108mph ON MT's
ON MAXXIS MAV1's 275/45/17 13.27 @ 106mph
RspecAU is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Reply


Forum Jump


All times are GMT +11. The time now is 03:27 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Other than what is legally copyrighted by the respective owners, this site is copyright www.fordforums.com.au
Positive SSL