|
Welcome to the Australian Ford Forums forum. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and inserts advertising. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features without post based advertising banners. Registration is simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. Please Note: All new registrations go through a manual approval queue to keep spammers out. This is checked twice each day so there will be a delay before your registration is activated. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
18-08-2006, 10:48 AM | #1 | ||
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 1,558
|
I have decided i want to do the LSD conversion to the classic, but am unsure of what ratio i should get, or if i should change it at all? i have been getting conflicting advice on how high the car should rev at 100km/h on the freeway. I was under the impression that the higher it reved, the more fuel i will use, but have also been told that it should be reving at about 2500 so it breaths better?
just wanted to get some feedback on experience? |
||
18-08-2006, 03:06 PM | #2 | ||
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 1,558
|
i think i am going to go with 3.45 ratio, seems like a bit of a balance between takeoff and economy on the freeway. Thanks anyway
|
||
18-08-2006, 03:17 PM | #3 | ||
Banned
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Beaumont Hills
Posts: 2,536
|
I would of gone with 3.7's or 3.9's personally..
theres next to no difference between the 3.45's and 3.7's from what ive felt in my car, 2/10ths if that.. and about 250rpm higher reving at speed. I wish I went for the 3.9's to be honest.. at 110km/h now I sit on about 2350-2400rpm |
||
18-08-2006, 04:01 PM | #4 | ||
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 1,558
|
thanks for that stiddy, thats what i was after. i havent confirmed it yet, i might do it next week so it has time to wear in before the aff nats. what is your car like day to day wise? does it make much of a difference when driving in trafic to the way the trans shifts at all?
cheers |
||
18-08-2006, 04:41 PM | #5 | ||
Banned
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Beaumont Hills
Posts: 2,536
|
Ive got a manual, but day to day driving you can barely notice it.
When you start playing silly buggers you can tell that the car is faster not a big difference though, mainly off the line.. 1st gear disappears on me in a blink, and 2nds not much slower.. and also, it seems to cruise better at lower speeds in top gear.. my car used to misbehave crusing at 80km/h in 5th, now I can cruise in 5th all day long from 70km/h onwards... |
||
18-08-2006, 04:47 PM | #6 | ||
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 1,558
|
awesome, i was originally reccomended 3.7's but was a bit scared it was too low for day to day driving. but if its not all that bad, i might go that way if it will make it feel more responsive. but then anything is going to feel better than the 3.08 i have now!! do you remember how much it cost you to get done, if you dont mind me asking?
|
||
18-08-2006, 05:01 PM | #7 | ||
Banned
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Beaumont Hills
Posts: 2,536
|
If you have an auto go for the 3.9's, I really recommend you do.
It will work so much better with the auto ratios. Huge improvement in acceleration, still be a very comfortable highway cruiser, and be a like a stock falcon in traffic. It cost me $760. |
||
18-08-2006, 06:04 PM | #8 | ||
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Melb north
Posts: 12,025
|
stiddy have you noticed much difference in your weekly fuel consumption???
|
||
18-08-2006, 06:11 PM | #9 | ||
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 1,498
|
Before you buy do some calcs.
Get your current gear box ratios and multipy each one by each of your possible diff ratios. This gives you the overall ratio of each combo in each gear. What you will then notice is things like a 3.9 x 5th (say 0.8) may equal a 3.45 x 4th (say 1.0). This is why a 3.7 or a 3.9 will cruise happily in top at low speeds, because its the same a driving arround in 4th with a 3.45, except a 3.45 will still have one gear to go for ecconnomy. The higher the ratio eg 3.9, the closer or less spread out the gear ratios become. So its a balance. Not much good having a first gear that is usless and an overdrive that is no longer doing its function. Do the maths, ask more questions, no what you really are trying to achieve. Also if you work out the rev difference for a given speed in top, take this number over your original revs at this speed and multiply this fraction plus 1.0, by your current fuel consumption, you will get very very close to what the end result will be. |
||
18-08-2006, 07:49 PM | #10 | |||
Banned
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Beaumont Hills
Posts: 2,536
|
Quote:
Being serious though, im getting more k's per tank since doing the diff gears.. I used to sit at 80 in 4th(because it didnt like crusing in 5th), now I sit on 80 in 5th at lower revs. I get to sit in 5th more often over 4th.. so lower revs is more fuel economy, well thats how it works in my car. In peak hour traffic 1hr 30mins every morning and arvo on the way to and from work 5 days a week, I get 400k from a tank.. I used to get about 320-350. If im not in peak hr I get 550k's, used to get about 480-500k.. and on the highway my biggest tank so far is 935k from about 860k. If I sit on 105-110km/h my car sips the fuel, if I sit on 115-120km/h it uses considerably more fuel.. strange, but that 5-10km/h makes a huge difference in how much I get out of a tank |
|||
18-08-2006, 09:02 PM | #11 | ||
Smile
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Merrylands Sydney
Posts: 8,541
|
What Do You Want To Do With The Car?
__________________
Stingray Car Security ph 0414445444 Single din radio fascias for fg to fgx fords Australia wide . FG 1 2 and 3 gauge holder in stock now! https://stingraycar.com.au/shop/ Site Sponsor See Sponsor Stingray Car Security 😍👌✌ AU wagon 6 14.241@96.75 1/4 mile sold.Octane fg xr6 turbo!! 12.312 112.21 mph home tune f6 injectors gone ..now in nitro fgxr6t ready to go again |
||
18-08-2006, 09:20 PM | #12 | ||
Moderator
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Kenthurst
Posts: 40,403
|
Would be interesting to see what it would be like on the ute as well ... i am sick of the auto being a dog down low ... it's rare for me to be out of the highway ... and a lot of my cruising is between 60-90km/h anyway.
That coupled with a few other things as well. hee hee Also LSD might be handy too
__________________
The Current Stable 2016 SZII TS Territory RWD Petrol The Evolution of the EGA54D utes AU Workshop Build thread of EGA54D B-Series Workshop Build thread of EGA54D 2004 SX TX Territory AWD - Gone but not forgotten 2010 FG XT "The ex-rental" - Moved onto a new home Mechan1k's Flickr Page |
||
18-08-2006, 09:51 PM | #13 | |||
Back on the road
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Wollongong, NSW
Posts: 3,205
|
Quote:
I love my diff gears (3.9's), I wouldn't think twice about doing it again or recommending it to anyone else. Anyone want to swap some 4.11's for my 3.9's?
__________________
------------------------------------------------------------------------- AU XR8 Ute 13.90 @ 100mph - http://www.aufalcon.com/xr8ute 5L Windsor, GT40X heads, Crane 2030, Pacey 4-1s, Lukey 3", 3.91:1, auto. Tuned by me w/Quarterhorse and BinaryEditor. Coming Soon: Ported lower intake, Tickford "Premium" Brakes, and a good wash. |
|||
18-08-2006, 09:53 PM | #14 | ||
Moderator
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Kenthurst
Posts: 40,403
|
So in other words it really does transform the ute ... even though it's a 99kw slug like mine????
I guess it will make it a hell of a lot more responsive in traffic than it is now.
__________________
The Current Stable 2016 SZII TS Territory RWD Petrol The Evolution of the EGA54D utes AU Workshop Build thread of EGA54D B-Series Workshop Build thread of EGA54D 2004 SX TX Territory AWD - Gone but not forgotten 2010 FG XT "The ex-rental" - Moved onto a new home Mechan1k's Flickr Page |
||
18-08-2006, 09:57 PM | #15 | |||
Back on the road
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Wollongong, NSW
Posts: 3,205
|
Quote:
The shorter gear means there is more torque at the wheels at the same road speed.
__________________
------------------------------------------------------------------------- AU XR8 Ute 13.90 @ 100mph - http://www.aufalcon.com/xr8ute 5L Windsor, GT40X heads, Crane 2030, Pacey 4-1s, Lukey 3", 3.91:1, auto. Tuned by me w/Quarterhorse and BinaryEditor. Coming Soon: Ported lower intake, Tickford "Premium" Brakes, and a good wash. |
|||
18-08-2006, 09:59 PM | #16 | ||
Moderator
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Kenthurst
Posts: 40,403
|
Sounds good to me ... I hate having to wait for the sluggish auto to respond to downshifts when wanting to push away ... might actually be better for the auto in traffic as well ... less stress and load on it. And better for towing me thinks as well.
__________________
The Current Stable 2016 SZII TS Territory RWD Petrol The Evolution of the EGA54D utes AU Workshop Build thread of EGA54D B-Series Workshop Build thread of EGA54D 2004 SX TX Territory AWD - Gone but not forgotten 2010 FG XT "The ex-rental" - Moved onto a new home Mechan1k's Flickr Page |
||
18-08-2006, 10:13 PM | #17 | |||
Was V6corp
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Canberra
Posts: 537
|
Quote:
Thats what ill tell the missus ;)
__________________
Car: 99 AU I Forte Sedan Colour: Blue Engine Mods: K&N Pod in a XR8 Pod Box; Performace fuel pump; 2 1/2" Exhaust Planned Engine Mods: ; Extractors; Tickford CAI; Twin Mufflers; Shift Kit; Hi-Stall; Cam; ECU Flash Bling Mods: Tinted Windows; JVC CD/DVD HU Planned Bling Mods: TS50 Front; High Series bonnet; Rebel Skirts and Rear Bar; SL Springs; Clear Side Indicators; Rear Spolier; Mags |
|||
18-08-2006, 10:16 PM | #18 | |||
Moderator
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Kenthurst
Posts: 40,403
|
Quote:
Same here .... hee hee
__________________
The Current Stable 2016 SZII TS Territory RWD Petrol The Evolution of the EGA54D utes AU Workshop Build thread of EGA54D B-Series Workshop Build thread of EGA54D 2004 SX TX Territory AWD - Gone but not forgotten 2010 FG XT "The ex-rental" - Moved onto a new home Mechan1k's Flickr Page |
|||
18-08-2006, 10:19 PM | #19 | |||
GT-P #0336
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 2,360
|
Quote:
But saying that, I had my reasons for wanting that particular gearing - the track. Suppose it all depends on what your reason is for doing yours really. If you're going with a complete LSD conversion, then I wouldn't even bother with 3.45. You may aswell go the whole deal and throw in some "fully sickness" lol.
__________________
2003 FULLY OPTIONED MERCURY SILVER BA GT-P BUILD #336
REVERSE CAMERA - SAT NAV - PIONEER SUB & AMP - SUNROOF - DVD PLAYER - CUSTOM DUAL EXHAUST ~Tuned By Bluepower Racing~ |
|||
18-08-2006, 10:26 PM | #20 | ||
Moderator
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Kenthurst
Posts: 40,403
|
I just want everyday better driveability in traffic and load pulling in the ute ... plus being underpowered and running on LPG with a tired auto transmission ... I think the 3.9s are sounding very good for me .... with a bit of highway work involved as well ... but mostly metro and outer metro driving .... and towing involved.
i don't need an exact gearset to get me over the 1/4 mile line at a certain amonut of revs, etc.
__________________
The Current Stable 2016 SZII TS Territory RWD Petrol The Evolution of the EGA54D utes AU Workshop Build thread of EGA54D B-Series Workshop Build thread of EGA54D 2004 SX TX Territory AWD - Gone but not forgotten 2010 FG XT "The ex-rental" - Moved onto a new home Mechan1k's Flickr Page |
||
19-08-2006, 10:54 AM | #21 | |||
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 1,558
|
Quote:
|
|||
19-08-2006, 01:46 PM | #22 | |||
GT-P #0336
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 2,360
|
Quote:
__________________
2003 FULLY OPTIONED MERCURY SILVER BA GT-P BUILD #336
REVERSE CAMERA - SAT NAV - PIONEER SUB & AMP - SUNROOF - DVD PLAYER - CUSTOM DUAL EXHAUST ~Tuned By Bluepower Racing~ |
|||
19-08-2006, 10:21 PM | #23 | |||
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Melb north
Posts: 12,025
|
Quote:
|
|||
19-08-2006, 10:39 PM | #24 | ||
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 784
|
i have recently changed to 3.9's in mine (5spd) .it sits on 2450 rpm @ 100kph ,with 225 /50 16inch tyres.on the hwy the econemy has gone from 750+ to around 650,around town i have picked up an extra 50 k's to the tank .i don't do much hwy driving so it's good for me. but when i'm out there and need to overtake i don't have to change back to 4th just put the foot down and go roun them .another bonus is, if you tow things it makes a huge difference with the shorter gears. so much easier to pull things.
if you dont do much freeway stuff i wouldn't put changing to 4.11's off the list either. |
||
20-08-2006, 12:32 PM | #25 | |||
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 1,558
|
Quote:
|
|||
20-08-2006, 03:03 PM | #26 | |||
Back on the road
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Wollongong, NSW
Posts: 3,205
|
Quote:
If you want that urge off the line, from a standing start, then you want a higher stall converter not shorter diff gears. A higher stall converter will make traction "tricky" from a standing start with too much throttle ;)
__________________
------------------------------------------------------------------------- AU XR8 Ute 13.90 @ 100mph - http://www.aufalcon.com/xr8ute 5L Windsor, GT40X heads, Crane 2030, Pacey 4-1s, Lukey 3", 3.91:1, auto. Tuned by me w/Quarterhorse and BinaryEditor. Coming Soon: Ported lower intake, Tickford "Premium" Brakes, and a good wash. |
|||
20-08-2006, 05:09 PM | #27 | |||
GT-P #0336
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 2,360
|
Quote:
So basically, yes. But that's my car. I've never driven a stocko with 3.9's in it so I don't know what effect it would have. Since you want to keep it civilised, then go with the 3.7's. It'll give you a decent punch off the mark and you'll still retain fairly good economy, especially if you do freeway driving.
__________________
2003 FULLY OPTIONED MERCURY SILVER BA GT-P BUILD #336
REVERSE CAMERA - SAT NAV - PIONEER SUB & AMP - SUNROOF - DVD PLAYER - CUSTOM DUAL EXHAUST ~Tuned By Bluepower Racing~ |
|||
20-08-2006, 06:51 PM | #28 | |||
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 1,558
|
Quote:
|
|||
20-08-2006, 08:40 PM | #29 | |||
Walking with God
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 7,321
|
Quote:
GK
__________________
2009 Mondeo Zetec TDCi - Moondust Silver 2015 Kia Sorento Platinum - Snow White Pearl 2001 Ducati Monster 900Sie - Red Now gone! 1999 AU1 Futura Wagon - Sparkling Burgundy On LPG Want a Full Life? John 10:10 |
|||
20-08-2006, 09:45 PM | #30 | ||
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 1,498
|
Take FS5's example.
750 reduced to 650 on the highway. This is a 13% reduction in economy. Because his engine is now turning 13% more revs than before. However at low low speed, in the burbs he claims an extra 50ks per tank. Let's assume in the burbs he normally gets get's 400ks per tank, with the new gears he gets 450ks, this relates to a 12.5% increase in economy. You can see by this it all depends where you are doing your K's . In FS5's example (highway driving) we can assume he had a 3.45 ratio diff initially, by (assuming his 750 to 650k's is accurate): At 100k his engine was spinning at 2450 with a 3.9 diff, therefore the wheels were spinning at 628rpm (2450 divided by 3.9) Since his total k's went down by 13%, with a 3.9, his original diff must have caused the motor to spin 13% slower, so: The wheels still need to spin at 628 but the motor needs to spin 13% slower at 2168, 2168 divided by 628 = 3.45. Therefore, if the facts given by FS5 were accurate and assuming highway driving is relatively efficient the original diff ratio was 3.45. So why does this same change give better Ks in the burbs??? Why does the maths not work for the burbs??? Simple....labouring.....read all the above and (apart from burnouts) everyone talks about not labouring in top gear or top gear now being sporty, same thing. Again using maths (and assuming your not after burn outs or towing a Mac truck) you can work out the following: Assume FS5 has a 5 speed box with the following ratios maultiplied by 3.45 and 3.9 and 4.11: 5 speed 3.45 3.9 4.11 Overall ratios 1st 3.35 11.56 13.07 13.77 2nd 1.92 6.62 7.49 7.89 3rd 1.29 4.45 5.03 5.30 4th 1 3.45 3.90 4.11 OD 0.72 2.48 2.81 2.96 Speed at 2168 1st 3.35 21 19 18 2nd 1.92 38 33 31 3rd 1.29 56 49 47 4th 1 72 64 60 OD 0.72 100 88 84 Speed at 2000 1st 3.35 20 17 17 2nd 1.92 34 30 29 3rd 1.29 51 45 43 4th 1 66 58 55 OD 0.72 92 82 77 Max revs 5500 1st 3.35 55 48 46 2nd 1.92 95 84 80 3rd 1.29 142 125 119 4th 1 183 162 153 OD 0.72 254 224 213 Revs at 60 1st 3.35 >5500 >5500 >5500 2nd 1.92 3469 3921 4132 3rd 1.29 2331 2635 2776 4th 1 1807 2042 2152 OD 0.72 1301 1470 1550 (bugger I can't get this table to display right) Studying this data is interesting. Note that in 4th with a 4.11 diff at 60ks is like driving in 3rd with 3.45's. Note also that none of the diff ratios really suits driving in OD at 60ks. Moral is for fuel economy in the burbs drive in lower gears and don't labour motor. Unless you want to do burn outs and tow Mac trucks in which case a 4.11 is the only way to go. |
||
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|