>25 threads per page.

14-06-2006, 02:08 AM

Just wondering, if it might be better to have more than 25 threads per page, from general ob's, seems the first 25 threads get all the attention! leaving many un-answered questions left behind.

this is not a critisim, it would be cool, if you could do this on just "new posts", and leave the rest as 25 per page, but I guess you can't/would not want to do that

I know sometimes there is many threads 200+, so not ness suggesting the whole lot, many double the amount, I think people only look at the first page 9/10 times??

anyway just another polite suggestion..

Laminge · 14-06-2006, 09:44 AM

We still have to accommodate for dial up users, something to look at in the future maybe

niko · 14-06-2006, 05:30 PM

how many dialupers are there still around lol ??????? (im sure theres a figure going around)

kinksta · 04-07-2006, 11:27 AM

i have dial up at work, and when im bored im on the forums. ADSL 2 at home though. but there are still plenty of dial uppers around, especially in the country.

RG · 04-07-2006, 11:43 AM

What no poll for this one lol. But seriously, I only just got rid of my D/U connection in favour of broadband and even with only 25 posts per page this isn't the most D/U friendly site. But it would be a good idea for the future, Ziggee must just of been born ahead of his time lol.

blackers10 · 05-07-2006, 01:25 AM

possibility of having a selectable thing.
one for dialup using only 25.. while the other having 50+ for hte brave and patient dial uppers and us Broadband uses

**Professor Farnsworth** · 05-07-2006, 01:32 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by blackers10

possibility of having a selectable thing.
one for dialup using only 25.. while the other having 50+ for hte brave and patient dial uppers and us Broadband uses

good idea - could be selectable in user profile..